Judging session – Wednesday 24 September 2025.
Shortlist announcement – Thursday 25 September 2025.
Judges will read and pre-score all entry forms, considering any supporting materials submitted. Judges will be asked to give a score for each question within the entry form, as listed in the bullet points below. These will be combined to give an overall score for each entry. All judges’ pre-scores will then be combined, and the highest-scoring entries will determine the shortlists.
Judges will meet to discuss the highest-scoring entries and then agree on the winner for each category.
The awards will be judged by some of the biggest names in search. Click here to see this year’s judging panel.
Entries should not exceed 1000 words in total and should relate to work undertaken between March 2024 – July 2025.
CAMPAIGN AWARDS
The judges will be looking for clear objectives, creative and effective implementation and tangible and demonstrable results in the campaign award categories. They will also consider the structure, presentation and clarity of each entry.
Each entry must include information under the following headings:
• Objectives & budget (1-10 points)
Judges will be looking for what you were looking to achieve from the campaign and any targets that were set. We recommend showing targets as quantifiable metrics e.g., ‘Increase conversions from 150 to 300 a month’ rather than ‘Increase conversions by 10%’. Please include a breakdown of implementation costs, staffing costs, agency fees etc. All elements of the entry form are confidential and judges will not share this information. If you are unable to provide a detailed budget breakdown, please include the financial band your budget is within along with the percentage budget allocated for staffing costs, agency fees and media spend etc.
• Target audience & strategy (1-10 points)
Judges will be looking for details about the audience you were targeting and your overall strategy to reach them, as well as the strategy to meet the overall objectives.
• Implementation & creativity (1-10 points)
Provide a detailed explanation of your implementation for the campaign. Include screenshots to help visualise campaigns. Provide information on the creativity of the campaign.
• Details of any challenges faced and how these were overcome (1-10 points)
Tell the judges what challenges were unique to you and how have you overcome them. What was the end result of overcoming these challenges?
• Results & evaluation (1-10 points)
Relate your results to the objectives and targets. Provide actual numbers rather than percentages wherever possible and show tangible results.
• Why should your campaign win? (1-10 points)
What do you think sets your campaign apart from the other campaigns being judged? Judges will in particular be looking for the thing that makes this campaign different from the others. What is unique?
Any entries that do not include information under these headings will be marked down. If appropriate you may include up to three pieces of supporting materials.
INNOVATION/SOFTWARE/PRODUCT AWARDS
The judges will be looking for a clear description of an outstanding innovation or product, with an indication of the budget. Judges will be looking for new features/tools added in the last twelve months for the software awards. They will also consider the structure, presentation and clarity of each entry.
Each entry must include information under the following headings:
• Overview of Innovation/Software/Product
Provide a synopsis of what the tool does and how it adds value to the end user.
• Total budget
Detail costs associated with running the innovation/software/product and how much you intend to sell the innovation/software/product for.
• Existing problems & target audience (1-10 points)
Include details outlining the problems that this innovation/software/product solves and how if at all these problems were previously dealt with. Detail who the target customers or users of this product are.
• USP & Features (1-10 points)
Outline what is the innovation/software/product’s unique proposition. Highlight the major features that are unique to the product/software or innovation that help solve a customer problem or benefit the customer positively.
• Key Metrics (1-10 points)
Detail what key metrics have you used to measure whether this innovation, software or product is successful. I.e., does it save money, make things faster, and generate more revenue?
• Why should your Innovation, Software or Product win? (1-10 points)
What single thing about your innovation, software or product is not done by anyone else? What makes it stand out to be award-worthy?
Any entries that do not include information under these headings will be marked down. If appropriate, you may include up to three pieces of supporting materials.
We also ask you to send a ‘European Search Awards’ log-in to allow judges to be able to test and evaluate your product if they feel necessary.
Please note judging is based on the application form and the judges’ industry knowledge of the tools. They are a highly experienced judging panel with in-depth industry knowledge so the tool log-ins requested are for any judges who feel that want to delve deeper into any claims/functionality detailed in the entry.
Please note if you cannot provide a login, please contact awards@dontpanicprojects.com.
AGENCY/TEAM/EMERGING TALENT AWARDS
Judges will be looking for agencies, teams or individuals that can demonstrate an ongoing and sustained commitment to delivering best practices while showing a creative and innovative approach to search. Judges will also consider the structure, presentation and clarity of each entry.
Each entry must include information under the following headings:
• Overview of the Agency/Team/Emerging Talent nominee
Provide an overview of the nominee. Include numbers, staff turnover, roles etc for agency and team nominations or current and previous job roles etc for emerging talent nominations
• Agency/Team/Emerging Talent objectives (1-10 points)
Tell the Judges what you were looking to achieve and any targets that have been set within the agency or team to help achieve your goals. What were your individual goals? We recommend showing targets as quantifiable metrics e.g., ‘Increase conversions from 150 to 300 a month’ rather than ‘Increase conversions by 10%’.
• Recent work example(s) (1-10 points)
Provide details of recent client or campaign work. How does your recent work display creativity and make your agency, team or emerging talent stand out amongst others?
• Details of any recent achievements (1-10 points)
What makes your team or agency stand out? Please include details of any achievements you feel make your agency or team award-worthy. What are you proud of?
• Details of any challenges faced and how these were overcome (1-10 points)
What challenges were unique to you and how have you overcome them? What was the end result of overcoming these challenges? Tell a story.
• Why should your Agency/Team/Emerging Talent win? (1-10 points)
Show the Judges what you feel makes you stand out amongst others and why you feel your entry is award-winning. What makes you unique? What gives you the competitive edge?
Any entries that do not include information under all of these headings will be marked down. If appropriate you may include up to three pieces of supporting materials.
SUPPORTING MATERIAL
A company or campaign logo (in JPEG format, max 2MB) must be uploaded along with each entry (this may be used on the website, event brochure and presentations should you be shortlisted).
If appropriate you may upload up to 3 pieces of supporting materials along with your entry. These can be in JPEG, PDF, or Microsoft Word, and must be under 2MB and could include items such as:
- Audited accounts
- Team CV’s
- Training and development records
- Copies of media coverage
- Media evaluation
- Client references
- RAJAR / ABC circulation figures
- Website analytics
- Testimonials
- Videos (via online link in form)
- Publications
- Marketing materials
- Photography
- Weblinks
- Market research findings
ETHICAL, TRANSPARENT, FAIR & CONFIDENTIAL
The MENA Search Awards prides itself on its ethical and transparent process and confidentiality is taken extremely seriously.
Judges are not allowed to enter any of the categories.
All judging discussions are confidential, and the material will not be shared with anyone outside of the judging panel before or after the ceremony. Judging papers will not be shared with any third parties and will be deleted immediately after the judging period. Judges can only access entries they have been asked to score.
Permission to use any material for winning case studies post-event will be sought from entrants.
